Counter Punch
by David Yearsley
July 24, 2020
Last Friday night while protesters were being shoved into unmarked
vans in Portland by federal paramilitaries, PBS broadcast George
Gershwin’s Porgy and Bess in its Great Performances series. The opera was a strange choice for these times. The live recording had been made on February 1st, little over a month before the Covid crisis darkened American theatres.
I didn’t watch the PBS broadcast, but instead took in the opera a few days later thanks to Met: Live in HD streaming available through the university where I work.
Though Porgy and Bess has long been criticized for its
treatment of race, the Met Live performance was introduced without any
acknowledgement of that history. The host was Audra MacDonald, a black
actor and singer with six Tony Awards to her name (is it also fair to
note that among her many recordings are The Wonder of Christmas
with the Mormon Tabernacle Choir and Orchestra at Temple Square).
MacDonald’s script praised the work as “one of the greatest of American
operas” and “the moving story of the citizens of Catfish Row.” MacDonald
did at least say that this “close-knit community” was oppressed. Though
the on-stage cast was black (except for the non-singing cops), the
conductor (David Robertson) was white like his baton. The stage director
(James Robinson) was also white, and, however vibrant, his production
was unquestioning—stubbornly disengaged from the world that has
overtaken this kind of entertainment since February.
I’d last seen a live performance of Porgy and Bess in 2008 in Berlin
presented by the touring company Cape Town Opera. That production, so
much sparer than the opulent Met presentation, was set not in a singing
and dancing waterfront slum in Jim Crow Dixie, but in a South African
township: that historical dissonance—and congruence—didn’t blunt the
cultural appropriation and violence of the work, but instead brought
them into sharp relief.
Having recently watched Hamilton on my living room screen, I couldn’t help but imagine what would happen if Porgy and Bess were given the reverse treatment: if the Founding Fathers can be black, what about an all-white cast for Porgy and Bess?
Yes, the opera is a product of its time. Yes, some leading black
figures, such as Langston Hughes, praised the work even in the 1930s.
But whiteface Porgy would, I couldn’t help but feel, shine a brutally
alienating spotlight on the fantasy.
I saw Porgy and Bess for the first on June 9th,
1995 in Los Angeles, three years after the riots after the exoneration
of the policemen who brutally beat Rodney King. The O. J. Simpson trial
was a few days from getting underway at the courthouse a brick’s throw
from L. A. opera’s home at Dorothy Chandler Pavilion. Earlier that
spring, the provocative American theatre director Peter Sellars had
brought to the same stage Debussy’s Pélleas et Mélisande with
the jealous, homicidal king Golaud sung by the great Willard White, a
black man. Leaving no room for ambiguity, Sellars parked a white Bronco
at the lip of the stage. No one thought that was product placement for
the local Ford dealerships. Club-wielding, gun-brandishing LAPD cops
periodically stampeded across the stage.
By contrast, the L. A. Porgy and Bess was lively (and long:
performed without cuts), but Hope Clark, the first African-American ever
to direct the show at a major venue, danced around the question of race
and its portrayal by the work’s creators. When I attended that
performance in 1995, I had been the music critic for America’s last real
country newspaper, the Anderson Valley Advertiser for a few years, and
filed a piece from L. A. on the production. Here, with all its faults,
is that twenty-five-year-old review. Not much has changed.
Now Da’s Opry, Boss
Anderson Valley Advertiser, June 14th, 1995
I discovered George Gershwin’s Porgy and Bess, or at least a
dozen of its most famous songs, through Miles Davis’ 1958 recording.
With the nonchalant intensity some call “cool,” Miles shaped the
melodies into their ideal forms, his improvisations provided the
definitive commentary. Crucial to the recording’s perfection was Gil
Evans, who led the big band and whose arrangements were equal to Miles’
genius. The Davis/Evans recording was Gershwin’s opera for me. As a
result I heard Porgy and Bess as a sort of absolute music almost
completely divorced from the song lyrics; I knew the words of the first
two lines of “Summertime,” but I had no idea of the work’s plot. Until a
few years ago I thought Porgy and Bess was a Broadway musical.
We arrived at Friday’s performance of Porgy and Bess at the Los
Angeles Music Center an hour early to buy the cheap rush tickets, then
sat out in the plaza and ate our picnic dinner surrounded by the
spectacle of opera- and theater-goers arriving. In the center of the
plaza is a fountain made up of more than a hundred inch thick geysers
shooting up from ground level. The spouts are divided into four matrices
about twenty-five feet square arranged in cruciform around a large
statue. Each matrix sprays up for ten or twenty seconds then falters and
goes dormant for an indeterminate length of time, never more than five
seconds. After studying the rhythms of the geysers over the course of
our dinner, I pleaded with Annette to let me try to dash across the
fountain during an inactive phase: “Can you imagine the thrill of making
it across without getting wet, and in front of all these people?”
Temperamentally opposed to this kind of pre-teen grandstanding, neither
was she eager to spend three hours of opera sitting next to a soaked
someone should things go wrong.
The L.A. performance of Porgy and Bess—the production itself is in large part that of the Houston Grand Opera—comes at the end of a typical season of works by European masters. Gershwin’s opera offers audiences a distinctly American music drama that depicts Southern black life and features an all-black cast. General directors of opera companies can count on Gershwin’s “folk opera” to provide some cultural diversity to this most rarefied of musical mediums. And although still a small minority of the audience, there were far more black people at the L.A. Porgy and Bess than is usual at performances of operas from the European canon.
Taking my seat inside the Music Center I flipped through the program in search of the expected essay on the opera. After fighting through the pages of benefactor lists and advertisements for cars and luxury homes I realized that, unlike the other operas in this year’s series, Porgy and Bess had not even rated an essay. In its place were obnoxious articles on “California Cuisine” and the “Summer Bonanza: a look at what’s Hot and New in the Southern California Housing market.” There was no information in the program on the genesis of the opera, and nothing about the librettists (Heyward and Dorothy DuBose, Ira Gershwin) or the composer—not even their dates.
The imperatives of corporate advertising aside, I can understand why no essay was included. Any honest writer would have undoubtedly followed the injunction of Duke Ellington, who, on seeing the first production of the opera in 1935, wrote that “The times are here to debunk Gershwin’s lampblack Negroisms.” It goes without saying that debunking is not one of this opera producers’ favorite pastimes, especially when it concerns an American classic that draws full houses. Rather than confront the problems posed by Porgy and Bess, the L.A. production chose simply to ignore them.
The L.A. performance of Porgy and Bess—the production itself is in large part that of the Houston Grand Opera—comes at the end of a typical season of works by European masters. Gershwin’s opera offers audiences a distinctly American music drama that depicts Southern black life and features an all-black cast. General directors of opera companies can count on Gershwin’s “folk opera” to provide some cultural diversity to this most rarefied of musical mediums. And although still a small minority of the audience, there were far more black people at the L.A. Porgy and Bess than is usual at performances of operas from the European canon.
Taking my seat inside the Music Center I flipped through the program in search of the expected essay on the opera. After fighting through the pages of benefactor lists and advertisements for cars and luxury homes I realized that, unlike the other operas in this year’s series, Porgy and Bess had not even rated an essay. In its place were obnoxious articles on “California Cuisine” and the “Summer Bonanza: a look at what’s Hot and New in the Southern California Housing market.” There was no information in the program on the genesis of the opera, and nothing about the librettists (Heyward and Dorothy DuBose, Ira Gershwin) or the composer—not even their dates.
The imperatives of corporate advertising aside, I can understand why no essay was included. Any honest writer would have undoubtedly followed the injunction of Duke Ellington, who, on seeing the first production of the opera in 1935, wrote that “The times are here to debunk Gershwin’s lampblack Negroisms.” It goes without saying that debunking is not one of this opera producers’ favorite pastimes, especially when it concerns an American classic that draws full houses. Rather than confront the problems posed by Porgy and Bess, the L.A. production chose simply to ignore them.
No comments:
Post a Comment